Tuesday, 5 June 2012

West Indies pride at stake - Barath


Sunil Narine bowls in the nets, Edgbaston, June 5, 2012
Sunil Narine could come into the West Indies side for the third Test at Edgbaston
Adrian Barath has called on his colleagues to help restore the pride of West Indies' cricket in the final match of the Test series against England at Edgbaston.
Barath, like the rest of West Indies' top four, has struggled to deal with England's seam attack in the first two Tests, but feels the team have shown signs of improvement and now just need to maintain their performance over a whole game in order to win tangible rewards for their progress. England have already secured the three-Test series with victories in the first two Tests at Lord's and Trent Bridge.
Barath has a point, though. Several times in recent Tests, West Indies have earned a position from which they might have gone on to win. Against India in Delhi - where India eventually won by five wickets - and against Australia in Bridgetown - where Australia won by three wickets - West Indies held the advantage after each side's first innings. Similarly, when England slumped to 57 for 4 chasing 191 to win in the first Test of the series at Lord's, West Indies had a wonderful opportunity to clinch a rare victory. On each occasion, however, one poor session has cost West Indies dear and allowed their opponents back into the game.
"We are getting ourselves into positions to win Tests over the last couple of months," Barath said. "Where we need to move forward in our cricket is carrying on for five days. Sometimes we dominate the game for three days, but then we mess up in one session. That's the mindset we're working upon. That is what Test cricket is all about. It's not a couple of hours; it's over the course of five days. You have to be on the money every day, every hour, every over.
"It's important, having not had any wins in the series so far, that we finish well in this last Test. There is a lot at stake. The pride of West Indies' cricket has been showing some signs of improvement for the last couple of months. It's about getting a Test win; getting a win against England. It's definitely nothing impossible for us. We showed at Lord's where we got those early wickets. If we had carried on getting wickets anything would have been possible. We're really looking forward to getting a win here and bringing some pride to the West Indies."
The tourists have strengthened their squad in recent days with the call-up of spinner Sunil Narine. While it is asking a great deal of Narine, a man with only six first-class games behind him, to come into the team for a Test debut after only a few days' acclimatisation, West Indies may well feel they have little to lose and that 'mystery' spin is England's Achilles heel. Narine looked some way below his best in the nets at Edgbaston on Tuesday and it would remain something of a surprise if he displaced Shane Shillingford, a man who took a ten-wicket haul against Australia only two Tests ago. But Narine's record - both in his limited first-class career and as arguably the leading bowler in the recent IPL season - is nothing short of exceptional. In those six first-class games he has claimed five five-wicket hauls and, in his last three, he has claimed 31 wickets at an average of under 10.
Barath, a fellow Trinidadian, knows Narine's game as well as anyone and feels he has what it takes to be a success at Test level.
"He has the ability to be a world-class bowler," Barath said. "What is good about him is that he is humble and he is always trying to figure out ways to improve and develop new deliveries. Everyone is looking at him on TV, doing their homework and trying to pick him. But he is always working on a new type of delivery. He is always developing something. A spinner of his capabilities will adjust his pace and flight to the conditions.
"Everyone has seen him in T20 and he's obviously made a name for himself even before he's played a Test. But I've played a couple of first-class matches with him this season and it wasn't easy. Most of the batsmen were really guessing and just sticking their bat out. I was fielding at bat-pad and I had a lot of catches there. It was not easy. Obviously the conditions are different - the ball doesn't turn as much in England - but by the fourth and fifth day any good spinner will extract spin."
Barath also admitted to some feelings of relief in the omission of James Anderson from the England team. While Anderson's series averages are relatively modest - he has claimed nine wickets at an average of 26.88 - he has beaten the bat often and proved particularly dangerous with the new ball.
"Any opener would say the same," Barath said, admitting his delight at Anderson's absence. "He's bowled well. He is deservedly England's cricketer of the year. There is no doubt in that when you face him. At Lord's he was swinging the ball all over the place - both ways - and bowling the best deliveries, but just not hitting the edge. Broad took seven wickets but Anderson looked like he was the one who would have taken seven wickets. He was unlucky."
Barath also welcomed the return of Chris Gayle to the West Indies limited-overs side. While Gayle's return came, arguably, at his expense, Barath appeared genuinely excited about the depth of West Indies squad.
"He's been in the set-up for years and everyone has respect for Chris," Barath said. "It's great to have him back and he'll lend experience to our players.
"Having Chris in our team makes it really solid. The depth in our batting - with Kieron Pollard, Darren Sammy, Darren and Dwayne Bravo, Marlon Samuels, Andrew Russell - mean that once we get it right at the top of the order and we get going in the Powerplay it would be difficult to say how could we not chase a big score. Or set one. So once we get it right, we have a good ODI team."

England v West Indies: Andy Flower - I had to rest James Anderson for his long-term future


Andy Flower has defended resting James Anderson from the third Test, warning that rotation was something both the players and the public would have to get used to with an ever-growing international schedule.

James Anderson - England v West Indies: Andy Flower - I had to rest James Anderson for his long-term future
Flat out: James Anderson receives treatment during a drinks break in the second Test at Trent Bridge
We are making this decision in the best interests of English cricket and not trying to over-complicate or devalue the game in any way,” Flower, the England team director, said at Edgbaston.
“I perfectly understand why James Anderson is disappointed to be left out, I would be surprised if he felt any different.
“Over the next couple of years the schedule is incredibly heavy so it is not only going to be Anderson, Stuart Broad and Tim Bresnan who are going to be our bowlers.
"It would be crazy and naive to think so. We are going to use other fast bowlers. This is part of growing our pool of fast bowlers.”
As ever, Flower’s passionate justification has logic and rigour. Yet, on the face of it, there is little difference in his prescription of rest for Anderson and Kevin Pietersen's desire to ditch 50-over internationals from his busy schedule.
The result is that both have ended up miffed; Pietersen because he has been forced to retire from all one-day cricket; Anderson for being told to stay at home for this match.
In this instance, context is everything and while Flower would not discuss Pietersen, he did admit that players and management “should be able to communicate like adults on these subjects”, and that players were “always able to discuss whether they needed a rest”.
Pietersen’s problem, it seems, is that he did not ask for his request (to drop 50-over cricket) to be considered but rather delivered a demand, one that England’s management clearly found unacceptable.
Anderson is not the sort to make demands – except when bowling – but he is unhappy at missing out at Edgbaston. Having taken 17 wickets in his past three Tests there he probably felt a decent haul was his for the taking again.
But Flower is, rightly, a stickler for putting personal goals behind those of the team and with the series already won he felt the collective benefit would come from the leader of the attack being rested.
“We came into this series with one goal, and that was to win the series. We’ve achieved that so our Test-match priorities now shift to the South Africa series,” Flower said.
“There is also a slight shift to the West Indies one-day series because that series stands at 0-0. If the Tests were 1-1 Anderson would play here, he’s not badly injured, just carrying a few niggles.”
Flower’s brief is to enable England to win cricket matches but perhaps it should be broader.
What his decision over Anderson does not take account of is the young lad turning up for this Test hoping to see Anderson, his hero, bowl the home side to victory.
It is of minor interest to him if England are able to get another 18 months out of Anderson three years down the line if his one chance to see him is now.
It is the one minor flaw in Flower’s argument. That apart, you cannot really fault his motivations for trying to keep his bowlers fresh, and it would be no surprise if Stuart Broad was also stood down for this match.
“The days of us playing our players until they snap physically or mentally are over,” Flower said.
“We think it our responsibility to manage things better than that. Does Wayne Rooney play every game for Manchester United? No, because he would break down.
Would you play your most valuable pitcher in every single game in a baseball season? No. In fact, you don’t even see them play full games.”
All teams would want their best players available for the big games though and England’s stance over Pietersen means he will not be part of their World T20 defence in Sri Lanka this autumn.
It is a big loss but one Jonathan Trott feels the team has taken philosophically.
“It’s a bit of a disappointment,” Trott said. “KP is box office and entertaining and a destructive batsman so it will take a bit to replace him.
"But the guys understand and support his decision and I’m sure there are people out there who can do the job.”
Source:http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/cricket/international/england/9312422/England-v-West-Indies-Andy-Flower-I-had-to-rest-James-Anderson-for-his-long-term-future.html

Middlesex and Somerset even at Lord's on day one


Gareth Berg
Honours are even between Middlesex and Somerset following a rain-affected first day at Lord's.
Somerset slipped to 1-2 and 45-3 with Corey Collymore, Tim Murtagh and Toby Roland-Jones all taking wickets.
Craig Kieswetter and James Hildreth (58) put on 80 for the fourth wicket, before Hildreth became a 100th first-class wicket for Gareth Berg.
Rain arrived in mid-afternoon and play was called off with Somerset on 130-4, Kieswetter unbeaten on 48.
“It was an intense morning session and Middlesex may feel unlucky not to have picked up a couple more wickets before lunch”
Kevin HandBBC London 94.9
Only seven points separated the two sides going into this game, with third-placed Somerset having played one more game than Middlesex in fourth.
Chris Rogers won the toss and invited Somerset to bat, a decision that initially paid dividends.
Opener Alex Barrow was out for a third-ball duck with wicketkeeper John Simpson pulling off a stunning diving catch, full stretch in his left glove.
Nick Compton, who last week became thefirst player to reach 1,000 runs this season, made only one.
Arul Suppiah played on to Roland-Jones for 15, before Hildreth and Kieswetter then put on 80 in 25 overs to recover the situation for Somerset.
Hildreth hit six fours in his three-hour stay at the crease, facing 132 balls, but was caught behind by Simpson as Berg brought up his milestone in his 48th first-class match.

VIEW FROM THE COMMENTARY BOX

BBC London 94.9's Kevin Hand:
"Middlesex will feel relieved to have removed James Hildreth before the early close after he and Craig Kieswetter led a recovery for Somerset.
"The visitors still have plenty of work to do after they were put in and reduced to 45-3. Much like the Sussex match last week, the new ball appears to be key at Lord's.
"It was an intense morning session and Middlesex may feel unlucky not to have picked up a couple more wickets before lunch.
"To their credit Hildreth and Kieswetter showed great resolve to hold the innings together but, with the partnership broken, the hosts will once again target early scalps on the second morning to restrict their opponents to a below-par total."

French Open: Andy Murray aims to end David Ferrer clay dominance


Coverage: Live text commentaries on BBC Sport website from 10:00 BST; updates & commentary on BBC Radio 5 live, 5 live sports extra and online
Andy Murray says he feared injury would bring a premature end to his French Open campaign, as he bids to beat David Ferrer on clay for the first time.
After overcoming a back injury to ease past Richard Gasquet, Murray heads into Wednesday's quarter-final 5-4 up in past matches with the Spaniard - but has lost their three meetings on clay.
"A few days ago I thought I was done so to get this far is great," Murray said.
"I've always found it tough against him on clay but I feel I'm playing well."

Head to head

Murray Ferrer
25Age30
4World ranking6
22/72012 win/loss record33/7
12012 titles3
22Career titles14
$20,376,752Career prize money$13,878,532
Having been troubled by a back spasm during his win over Jarkko Nieminen in round two, the 25-year-old's injury worries appeared to have resurfaced when he was left clutching his hip as Gasquet easily won the first set on Monday, only for the Scot to rally and clinch a 1-6 6-4 6-1 6-2 triumph.
Although history is not in Murray's favour against Ferrer, the pair have not played each other on clay for two years and, since that meeting in Madrid, the world number four has won four of their five clashes on hard courts.
"Every match is different," said Murray. "A lot of the clay courts play differently - quicker, slower. Conditions change things. We'll just see whether having lost to him a few times on the clay before is a factor or not."
Six-time French Open winner Rafael Nadal, who faces Nicolas Almagro,is likely to await the winner in the last four, but Murray, the only non-Spaniard left in the bottom half of the draw, insists talk of a semi-final rematch against the reigning champion is premature.
He said: "I think he (Ferrer) is one of the toughest guys to play on any surface. He's number six in the world, and he's been there for a long time now. He's had a good clay-court season so far.
"We know each other's games very well, and he's one of the best players in the world on any surface, so it's going to be a tough match."
Ferrer, seeded sixth, has never been past the quarter-finals at Roland Garros, but is yet to drop a set in Paris this year.
He said: "I don't know if I'm playing my best tennis, it's difficult to say that, but I am in a good moment. I am playing very good at both this tournament and overall this season."
Source:http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/tennis/18332437

Thursday, 24 May 2012

Strauss issues Twitter warning to England squad


England captain Andrew Strauss issued a warning to his squad on Thursday regarding the dangers of Twitter after Kevin Pietersen's latest spat on the social networking site.

Pietersen, one of England's leading batsmen, was fined an undisclosed sum on Wednesday by the England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) for going on to Twitter to question the credentials of former England international Nick Knight as a Test match commentator of Sky Sports.

Strauss, speaking on the eve of the second Test against the West Indies here at Trent Bridge, said that Twitter was a double-edged sword.

"I'm far too boring to use it!," he joked. "There are always shades of grey with Twitter. It does a really good job of publicising the game but players can find themselves in hot water occasionally.

"There is a line they need to tread with regards to their conditions of employment. We have our own code of conduct and it is manageable.

"You will get occasions when people step out of line and they will be dealt with accordingly," he said.

Pietersen reacted to being fined an undisclosed sum, part suspended for 12 months, by insisting he had nothing against Sky, whose commentary team includes several former England captains.

"Just so as you know, (Michael) Atherton, (Nasser) Hussain, (David) Gower and (Ian) Botham, legends," Pietersen said as he walked into the pavilion after net practice here on Thursday.

Pietersen took to Twitter last week to question the credentials of Knight, who averaged just 23.96 in 17 Tests with one hundred, as a broadcaster.

"Can someone please tell me how Nick Knight has worked his way into the commentary box for the Tests? Ridiculous," said Pietersen, who has 20 Test hundreds to his credit.

Pietersen's comments about Knight were especially sensitive, as Sky agreed in January a new four-year deal to show live international and county cricket believed to be worth at least £260 million ($408 million) - the ECB's main source of income.

An ECB statement issued Wednesday said Pietersen had been fined for comments considered to be "prejudicial to the interests of the ECB and a breach of the England player conditions of employment in relation to clauses regarding public statements."

ECB managing director Hugh Morris, himself a former international batsman, is wary of Twitter, once labelling its use by England players as "like giving a machine gun to a monkey".

The 31-year-old Pietersen, 31, had previously taken to Twitter to accuse Knight of "stealing a living" from Sky last year and had also run into trouble after using the site to announce his omission from an England one-day squad.

Knight, who has questioned Pietersen's place in that one-day team, said, in comments reported by the Daily Mail on Thursday: "He (Pietersen) has his opinions and I have had my say about him on a professional basis.

"A lot of it has been full of admiration for the way he plays and I don't see this as a big issue."

The second Test - in which Pietersen is expected to play - starts on Friday with England 1-0 up in the three-match series following a five-wicket win over the West Indies at Lord's.

BCB clears payment due to Pak players after legal threat


BCB clears payment due to Pak players after legal threatKarachi: Pakistan players have finally received their outstanding dues from the Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB), after a legal action threat issued by the Federation of International Cricketers Association (FICA) to the BCB over non-payment of dues to the players who took part in the Bangladesh Premier League (BPL). 

"I got my full dues two days back from the BPL," the Daily Times quoted former Pakistan captain Shahid Afridi, as saying.

Afridi was one of the most expensive players purchased in the players bid for the tournament. 

FICA chief executive Tim May had sent a letter to BCB president Mustafa Kamal a few days ago, asking him to clear the dues of all overseas and local players who took part in the BPL within five days or face legal action. 

Afridi, who only played in the semi-final and final for Dhaka and had a price of around 700,000 dollars in the bid, said he had enjoyed his experience of playing in the BPL. 

The FICA stepped in after several overseas players, including Australians, who played in the BPL claimed that the franchises had not fulfilled their promise of clearing their full payments within 45 days after the last match of the BPL. 

People who are raving about IPL are mad: Bishan Singh Bedi


People who are raving about IPL are mad: Bishan Singh BediNew Delhi: Former India captain Bishan Singh Bedi lashed out at the Indian Premier League and asked the youngsters ‘don`t fall for this trap’ as the Twenty20 extravaganza make them ‘go astray’.

“Players like Rahul Dravid, Adam Gilchrist have finished with the game. Michael Clarke does not want to play T20 cricket for Australia; Sachin Tendulkar doesn`t want to play T20s for India. This is just an outing for them to have some fun and in the process, make a quick buck. Youngsters should not take it as a role model activity, but unfortunately, they will,” he told Mid-Day.

“People who are raving about IPL are mad. They are raving about IPL because of the money. This nonsense is all about money, money and more money. The base of the entire IPL is very, very fragile. It is a business proposition and any business must have the base of ‘principles first, profits afterwards’. But, here, there are no principles, only profits and that too, only for the players and BCCI,” he added.